Enterprise AI adoption, measured.
Global AI Forum maintains the independent record of enterprise AI adoption: which vendors are deployed, inside which organizations, at what stage, and on what evidence. One subject, nothing else.
Claims first notice intake
Property and casualty insurer, United States. Full deployment confirmed by the organization named in the claim.
Established 11 Sep 2026 · current to 11 Sep 2027
How a claim becomes a measurement
Every claim that enters the Index is taken through five evidence layers. We publish what each layer established and the date it was established on. We do not publish the weighting between them.
Attribution
Where the claim came from, held word for word, with the page it stood on, the day it was taken and the form it was published in.
Documentation
Contract, invoice and account status examined at the vendor under non‑disclosure. It proves money moved. It proves nothing about deployment.
Operation
The organization named in the claim answers for itself: whether it is running, who owns it inside the business, and whether the description is accurate.
Position
How far in it has reached. The function it touches, the population working through it, and whether it survived handover to the people who have to run it.
Time
Every determination carries the day it was established and the day it stops being current. A level is permanent. Its currency is not.
The layers are public. The weighting between them, the thresholds that carry a claim from one level to the next, and the signal set inside each class are held by the Forum and reviewed every edition. A published threshold is a threshold that can be engineered to.
We are paid to check claims. We are never paid for what the check finds.
Vendors pay to be checked
Verification is commissioned and it is charged for. That is how this work is funded, and we would rather print it than be asked.
Nobody pays for the outcome
The fee buys the check, never the result. A claim that does not hold is published as not held, at the same price, in the same place.
Who asked for it is on the record
Every entry names whether the vendor, an enterprise or an investor commissioned it. Nothing comes off the record once it is on it.
Every claim, its level, and the log of how it got there
A vendor sends you their record. You open it and read the evidence for yourself: every customer claim they have made, what each one was taken through, and the dated chain underneath it.
XYZ AI
Claims and servicing automation · Record GAIF-IX-0427
The organization is never named
Enterprises answer honestly when the answer is not a press release. We publish the sector, region, size band and function, and hold the identity.
No score, no rank, no quadrant
A record states what was established and at what stage, on a date. It does not grade the vendor and it never orders them against each other.
What failed stays visible
Claims that did not verify are published next to the ones that did, and so are the ones where nobody answered.
A record opens for anyone holding the link. Vendors send it into a deal, enterprises forward it to a committee, investors attach it to a memo. No sign-in to read one. What sits behind a login is the register itself: the whole category, the exports, and the claim data underneath.
Register accessEvaluating someone we have not indexed yet?
Tell us who is on your shortlist. If the vendor is not yet in the Index we open a record, capture every customer claim standing on their own site, and publish what is there. Capture is free, nobody is asked for permission, and the vendor finds out the same way everyone else does.
We measure a category whole, not the loudest ten in it
Every vendor in the category, every claim each of them makes, and the use cases the industry is actually buying against. Absence from a category is a finding too.
The Enterprise AI 100
One hundred companies ordered on whether an enterprise actually runs them. Not on what they raised, not on who is loudest. The List ranks and prints its arithmetic in full so it can be argued with precisely. The Index never ranks anything. Different instruments, same evidence.
Three audiences, one question, asked at three different moments
The Index exists because the same question is asked before a contract, before an investment and before a renewal: is this actually deployed, and how far in has it gone.
Before the committee signs
The business case rests on claims the vendor made about itself. The record shows which of those an organization has confirmed, at what stage it is running, and when anyone last checked. Most claims never leave Level 1.
- Open any record you are sent, free
- Commission a check on a shortlist before contract
- Read a vendor against its own category, not its deck
Before the money moves
A customer logo is a logo and a case study is a case study. Neither establishes that the deployment is running, how deep inside the business it reaches, or that it survived the first renewal. We establish it, and we report what did not hold.
- Claim verification ahead of a round or an acquisition
- Portfolio-wide deployment review, once a year
- Category depth before the thesis is written
Before the buyer has to ask
Your customer claims are already in the Index, taken from your own site. Verification turns an assertion a buyer has to take on trust into something they can open in the room, with your name on it and ours underneath it.
- Contract and enterprise verification, claim by claim
- A badge that reads live from the record
- Annual renewal, so currency never silently lapses
The measurement is what we publish. The work happens in the room.
We sit with the people accountable for enterprise AI adoption and bring the record of what their market is actually running into the room with us.
Published research, free to read
Each series answers a single question about enterprise AI adoption and prints the evidence behind the answer. No series is sponsored.
Identity and onboarding agents in retail banking
Nineteen claimed deployments checked with the banks named in them.
Report · October 2026The ten manufacturing use cases that matter in 2027
What is live, what is scaling and what is still a slide.
Guide · September 2026Reading a vendor's customer page properly
Forty minutes on what a logo wall does and does not tell you.
Webinar · 12 November 2026The people who had to make it work
Operators on what survived contact with their own organization.
Episode 14 · October 2026The adoption record, weekly
What was established, what lapsed, and what did not hold. Written for the people who carry the enterprise AI decision, not for the people selling into it.
No vendor sponsorship. No list sharing. One click to leave.
Have a claim you want measured?
Vendors commission a check on their own deployments. Enterprises and investors commission it on somebody else's. The method, the fee and the published record are identical either way, and so is what happens when a claim does not hold.